Appreciate (Russian translation)

Предпочитаете по английски беседовать? Или думаете , что я по-русски хуже понимаю?
No problem. Now I get it where those tags come from - I'm kinda new here.
I don't know who put those definitions together, they make some sense but not quite.
I only make "singable" translations in my definition of "singable", which is very
simple - you should be able to sing to the original melody without major distortions of words.
Occasional transfer of accent here or there is OK if it does not sound ridiculous. Not all placements
of accents in the same positions as in the original are equally important, some are very important, others are not important at all.
In FAQ 3.14 the definition of "singable" is truly lacking and I think I know why. Whoever put it together is/was not a singer and
mixed up the concepts of a poem and a lyric (words of a song). Those are different animals. Of course, many poems can be put to music
and become songs. Lyrics of many songs can stand on their own as poems. But not all. Far from all.
What's required from the lyric is to "hit" all the notes of the melody. The melody defines rhythm, has to be rhythmic by definition
(time signature and all), the lyric does not have to be rhythmic and pretty often it is not, even though it is still singable. The main reason
is that in a song some syllables last several times as long as others and it is still the same time signature. There's also issue of rests in the
melody. So the definition of "singable" in FAQ 3.14. as applied to song translation is laughable. If you really want to sing your translation
(TO THE ORIGINAL MELODY), go with my definition of "singable" and forget about creating abstractly "almost rhythmic" text.