Russia is waging a disgraceful war on Ukraine. Stand With Ukraine!

[SOLVED] "For" at beginning of sentence

9 posts / 0 new
Russian asset
<a href="/en/translator/schnurrbrat" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1414669">Schnurrbrat</a>
Joined: 07.03.2019
Pending moderation

Hello.
Please help me out, English speakers.

I want to begin my sentence with "For", used as a coordinating conjunction. Is it legit?
For example, the sentence [ I am fat, for I really into bagels ] does make sense to me, but what about [For I really into bagels, I am fat ]?
Or any other similar sentence with two clauses:
A is ..., for B is this and that
For B is this and that, A is ....

FYI, I've found and read this funny post on the topic:
https://www.quora.com/Can-you-start-a-sentence-with-for
and I tried to read this very long and probably very useful post:
http://wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22493&sid=37cf1f2047138...

But I still would like to hear what natives are thinking on this subject.
Thank you.

Super Member
<a href="/en/translator/juliaarkhitektorova" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1488578">Julia_Arkhitektorova</a>
Joined: 07.02.2021

For to admire an' for to see,
For to be'old this world so wide --
It never done no good to me,
But I can't drop it if I tried!
RK

Super Member
<a href="/en/translator/blacksea4ever" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1390089">BlackSea4ever</a>
Joined: 19.07.2018
Moderator 🍬
<a href="/en/translator/l%C3%ADadan" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1109697">líadan</a>
Joined: 31.03.2012

For I am really into....- would be the correct way of saying it.

Russian asset
<a href="/en/translator/schnurrbrat" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1414669">Schnurrbrat</a>
Joined: 07.03.2019
BlackSea4ever a écrit :

For I really into bagels, I am fat ]? — for I am really into

Thank you, I really like when you do that, my comments are always given priority over thousands of Rus-Eng translations asking (in vain) for proof-reading.

Moderator 🍬
<a href="/en/translator/l%C3%ADadan" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1109697">líadan</a>
Joined: 31.03.2012

Conjunction (literary) Because, as, since (similar to: given that, seeing that etc.)

Russian asset
<a href="/en/translator/schnurrbrat" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1414669">Schnurrbrat</a>
Joined: 07.03.2019
líadan a écrit :

For I am really into....- would be the correct way of saying it.

I guess this question can be closed now.
Thank you all for this interesting discussion about my typo, it was really useful.

Super Member
<a href="/en/translator/blacksea4ever" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1390089">BlackSea4ever</a>
Joined: 19.07.2018

I just happened to see it. No offense, but I spent less than 15 min here and certainly did not mean any offense…

Editor
<a href="/en/translator/sandring" class="userpopupinfo username" rel="user1263066">sandring</a>
Joined: 18.10.2015
Citation :

I guess this question can be closed now.

I don't think so, 42. "For" as a conjunction which introduces a subordinate of reason must come AFTER the main clause.

I'm fat for I'm into bagels.

If you want a subordinate to precede the main clause it must be "since", "as" or a couple of other conjunctions/linkers

Since/As I'm into bagels I'm fat.

My advice. Use 'as' - it's totally universal wherever it were in a sentence. Regular smile